As the title proclaims, in today's blog-post we will be discussing who killed Juliet in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Now, I know what some of you might be thinking: "But Troy, Juliet wasn't killed by anyone because she committed suicide!" That may be true, but although Juliet was never directly killed by anyone, doesn't mean that someone wasn't indirectly responsible for her death!
The person I believe is indirectly responsible for Juliet's death is her father, Lord Capulet.
The reasoning behind my choice is that Lord Capulet was forcing Juliet into a marriage with Paris; a marriage she was greatly against because she had already made a commitment to Romeo. She has a huge argument with her father regarding the subject and, eventually the debate gets to the point where it became violent and threatening, and her father even told her to "do as he says or he will leave her to die in the streets." So, in response, she chose death over her father's orders.
In conclusion, Lord Capulet influenced Juliet's decision to commit suicide because he backed her into a corner when he told her it was either marry Paris, or die. Frightened and depressed, she chose death over the marriage.
Now, goodnight everyone!
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
Romeo and Juliet: Love?
March break is over already... )':
I think that march break should be extended to two weeks; one week just flies by far two quickly!
But regardless, thats enough ranting, in today's blog entry, we will be discussing even more quotations from the famous Shakespearean play, Romeo and Juliet.
This quotation expresses the concept of Love vs Lust because it is basically saying, that Juliet posses great power over Romeo's heart and that he would do anything for her, without thinking; he has been brainwashed by her love. It may sound romantic, but can their relationship really be classified as true love?
In my opinion this can't be considered true love, and falls more along the lines of lust. Romeo is willing to do anything for Juliet, but I wouldn't call this submissive behavior love because his reasons for doing so are more along the lines of infatuation, in that they aren't well justified; throughout the play he talks about how much he loves Juliet but, not once did he ever explain why. You see, my definition of true love involves loving someone for they're character and personality traits, and not just how they look on the outside. Romeo doesn't know Juliet, and they were only united based on the skin deep first impressions that they had of each other.
Now that concludes our blog entry for today and, as always, I hoped you enjoyed it!
Good night every one~! :)
I think that march break should be extended to two weeks; one week just flies by far two quickly!
But regardless, thats enough ranting, in today's blog entry, we will be discussing even more quotations from the famous Shakespearean play, Romeo and Juliet.
"Alas poor Romeo! he is already dead; stabbed with a white wench's
black eye; shot through the ear with a love-song; the very pin of
his heart cleft with the blind bow-boy's butt-shaft" -Mercutio, ActII Scene IV
This quotation expresses the concept of Love vs Lust because it is basically saying, that Juliet posses great power over Romeo's heart and that he would do anything for her, without thinking; he has been brainwashed by her love. It may sound romantic, but can their relationship really be classified as true love?
In my opinion this can't be considered true love, and falls more along the lines of lust. Romeo is willing to do anything for Juliet, but I wouldn't call this submissive behavior love because his reasons for doing so are more along the lines of infatuation, in that they aren't well justified; throughout the play he talks about how much he loves Juliet but, not once did he ever explain why. You see, my definition of true love involves loving someone for they're character and personality traits, and not just how they look on the outside. Romeo doesn't know Juliet, and they were only united based on the skin deep first impressions that they had of each other.
Now that concludes our blog entry for today and, as always, I hoped you enjoyed it!
Good night every one~! :)
Friday, 9 March 2012
Rhetorical Devices in Romeo and Juliet
At long last, March break is finally here! I'm so excited
for a nice relaxing vacation, and It looks like this is just what I need to help break up my busy schedule! Get it? Break, as in, march
break; it's a pun!
A pun, as I have demonstrated, is "a play on words with
the same sound but with different meanings," and is a type of Rhetorical
device. Speaking of which today, we will
be discussing the use of Rhetorical devices in the legendary play, Romeo and
Juliet.
The Rhetorical device I would like to discuss today is known as a metaphor, which is defined as a comparison between two nouns without
the use of the words like or as. Take for example the quotation "He is the east, and
Juliet is the sun." This quotation is an example of a metaphor because it
compares Juliet to the sun and, Romeo to the east, without using like or as. To analyze this quotation even further, since Juliet is the Sun and Romeo is the east, it might
be implying that they were destined to meet, as the sun is always destined to set in the east.
On the other hand, there is also a Rhetorical device known as a Simile. A simile is like a metaphor, as it does make comparisons between to nouns however, it does so with the use of like or as. As a result, similes sound less aggressive than metaphors and much more suggestive; rather than stating that something is something else, it only implies that it is like something else instead. This is the reason I think similes aren't as common as metaphors in Shakespearean literature; since metaphors are much more aggressive than similes they make the writing feel a lot more passionate as a result.
Well, I hope you all enjoyed
reading my newest blog entry
Friday, 2 March 2012
Shakespearean Literature
Life isn't exactly fair but, thankfully, in today's day and
age, most countries have established a
consistent set of human rights like, take for example, the right to an
education. Can you imagine living your life without any rights; you might feel
powerless and insignificant. You might even feel oppressed, having to
constantly live your life while abiding to a higher force of power. In other
words, you might feel very similar to
how the women of the 1590s might have felt.
Now, for those of you who aren't familiar with Shakespearean
literature, the mid 1590s was when Shakespeare's well known play, "Romeo
and Juliet," was written. At the time, the rights of women were pretty
much nonexistent and, as a result, this was reflected in Shakespeare's writing;
an example of which, would be how the majority of the female cast in Romeo and
Juliet are virtually powerless, in comparison to the male cast, with very
little influence regarding important decisions. Now, there have been many debates
regarding the sexism in Shakespeare's plays; some think that the exploitation
of the issue of sexism was strictly for comedic value, while others think that
the plays accurately reflect Shakespeare's mindset, in regards to the rights of
women.
Now, what do you think?
Is Shakespearean literature evidence enough that Shakespeare
might not have respected the rights of women or, are they simply a parody of
how women were treated at the time?
Post your thoughts in a comment, below!
I hope you all enjoyed reading my second blog entry,
and I hope you all have a good weekend!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)